Publicación pausada
Vendido por BIBLIOSTORE URUGUAY

+100

Ventas concretadas

Brinda buena atención

Características del producto

Características principales

Título del libro
On training analysis. Debates
Autor
APA Asociación Psicoanalítica Argentina
Idioma
Español
Editorial del libro
APA
Tapa del libro
Blanda

Otras características

Cantidad de páginas
244
Peso
380 g
Género del libro
Teoría psicoanalítica (psicología freudiana)
Subgéneros del libro
Psicología
ISBN
9789874700865
Código IBIC
JMAF
IBIC
TEORÍA PSICOANALÍTICA (PSICOLOGÍA FREUDIANA)

Descripción

MERCADOLIBROS UY



DATOS IMPORTANTES

- Libro 100% original

- STOCK DISPONIBLE!
Listo para retirar o despachar en 72hs hábiles desde que se confirma la compra

- NO se aceptan cambios ni devoluciones
- Coordinar la entrega y abonar el costo del libro + envío (si necesita) para confirmar la compra
- SOLO aceptamos MercadoPago (todas las tarjetas + Abitab y RedPagos)



ENTREGA

- DESPACHO GARANTIZADO en 72hs hábiles
Desde el día de confirmación de compra

- Pick up GRATIS en zona centro, cerca de plaza independencia

- Envíos a todo el país
Consulte costo de envío según la zona de entrega

- Comunicarse por mail o whatsapp para coordinar entrega, recuerde que no se confirma la compra hasta no acordar la entrega
- Para costo de envío aceptamos Abitab, RedPagos, transferencias BROU y Scotiabank



------
ON TRAINING ANALYSIS. DEBATES
- ISBN: 9789874700865
- Editorial: APA
- Autor: APA ASOCIACION PSICOANALITICA ARGENTINA
- Tamaño: 230x160x13mm
- Peso: 380gr
- Páginas: 244
- País de publicación: ARGENTINA
- Lenguaje: ENGLISH

SINOPSIS
Training in analysis

DESCRIPCIÓN
Papers by V. Ungar (Argentina, current President of the IPA) , C. Borensztejn, current President of the Argentine Psych. Association, C. Barredo (Argentina), L. Bleger (France), C. Eizirik ( Brazil) , M. C. Fulco (Uruguay, current President of Fepal), M. Erlich Ginor (Israel), G. Foresti (Italy), J. García (Uruguay), M.Gauthier (Canada), W. Glover (USA), Ch. Levin (Canada,) F. Orduz (Colombia), G. Perdigao (USA) ) G. Spotorno Fornari (London) , and A. Staehle (Berlin, current Chair of the Education Committee of the IPA)... an important contribution in favor of a profound debate at the international level, and I believe that here is where we can find the fundamental value of this initiative. Only an open, honest and inclusive discussion will allow that such an important topic as the training of future psychoanalysts can help to the development of psychoanalysis regarding the future of our practice and the validity of our discipline. Training is a complex yet exciting subject. V.UngarTo what extent is critical and independent thinking welcomed? To what degree do procedures and rules become a type of fetish that must be obeyed just because?Do institutions revise and modify their curricula, procedures and manner of understanding analytic training overtime, as new national and international ideas on the subject and the learning process itselfemerge? In my view, these and other questions are helpful for evaluating how each analytic institution is dealing with the never ending process of analytic training. Claudio Eizirik.The fundamental question is, what of psychoanalysis do we want to transmit to the new generations, and how?The coming generations live in an interdisciplinary and constantly changing world. For the future and the survival of psychoanalysis, we must offeran education that they are passionately committed to, that includes high but achievable standards, and that is open enough to take into account different cultural and social conditions. Angelika StaehleEvery training system is (and should be in my view) ongoing work in progress. If it is not, it becomes set in stone and petrified. The main components of the training must be periodically rethought, critically reviewed, and either reconfirmed or transformed. Past debates should not be a deterrent to present considerations. Discussions about training are often emotionally charged, suggesting that the issues at stake are beyond those openly stated, probably containing the insecurities of our field. M. Erlich Ginor